8

I recently did web development work for client in UK (I am from India).

Before giving the quotation, I did detailed research about the charges for web development in the UK and for a medium-sized website; the charge was between £1000-2000 on average.

My client wanted a much more affordable quotation since they are outsourcing me and UK designers have to pay a lot of taxes and I do not.

Finally I made a decent website which took around 50 hours of work and I gave the final bill of £400. Its over a month and my client is still processing the bill; they are giving reasons which are not convincing. Lately, I'm doubting whether I had overcharged them.

Even though this is massively under the usual charge for the client, is this still reasonable behaviour?

3
  • 1
    Firstly: what agreements did you have with your client over payment terms? Also, what reasons did the client give?
    – Amelia
    Commented Nov 20, 2013 at 15:47
  • 2
    Also, from personal experience in web dev in the UK, since you paid 1/8th the usual price of a site from a professional company and yet they still have not paid, they probably had no intention of paying in the first place and are probably terrible clients...
    – Amelia
    Commented Nov 20, 2013 at 15:54
  • 3
    I am a web developer in the UK and that is very cheap. You have definately not over charged them (provided your work is of decent quality). I also host most of my clients, if they don't pay in the contract they have a 2 month period after which time their project/site is taken offline.
    – tim.baker
    Commented Nov 22, 2013 at 10:15

5 Answers 5

12

As I can see, you charged them 8 pounds per hour, which is $13 per hour. This is a very good price and you definitely did not overcharge them.

Your other mistake is that you investigated the price of work in the UK. You cannot do that. If they wanted a UK developer, they would have taken one. You have to charge them your hourly price, which is enough to live comfortably (in India). I used to work for UK companies who rented their developers for 300 pounds per hour, while they paid me less than 10% of that money. I was sore, but I could not complain since these are not the "rules of the game". So accept it like me or you will have a lot of problems finding clients.

If they still have not paid you, this is suspicious. I sincerely hope that you did not transfer your work to their servers; always keep work on your servers until your are fully paid.

5 to 7 days is reasonable. 1 month is very suspicious. This is not reasonable.

How are they paying you? An online service like PayPal, etc.?

4

The rate seems pretty fair to me but should not matter assuming you have an agreement from the client to pay an amount for a product or service that you have delivered.

One tactic you might like to try is to threaten to place the debt with a debt collection agency in the UK if it is not paid within a certain amount of time. A UK debt collection agency will be able to submit the debt to a credit reference agency if it is not paid and this will affect your client's credit rating.

It's unlikely a client would risk their credit rating over a £400 invoice.

1
  • Can you do that in the UK? Submit a debt to a credit agency and they will accept it? I know a lot of collection agencies require bulk submissions, leaving a lot of smaller businesses to sue if they can. That's pretty good if you can submit single accounts to agencies if you can AND also be out of the country as well.
    – o_O
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 21:47
4

The amount you charge is somewhat irrelevant. It does not even come remotely close to anything I'd ever consider as "over" charging. If I wanted to work for $13/hr I'd have full time job, which would still pay better than that. All clients want better/cheaper pricing. All of them. It's not up to the client to dictate your pricing, it's up to you. But that's another matter.

If you have a preferred payment period, that should be noted on all invoices "Due upon receipt" or "Net 15 days" or whatever.

You shouldn't overreact or worry if a client take 2, 3, or even 4 weeks to pay. Many simply have to processes the payment through various business sections. Remember if they mail a check, it could take 10 days to get to you easy, if not more.

I use Net 15 days on my invoices but I won't say anything until day 31. Then I'll resend the invoice. If I don't see payment within 10 days of the second invoice, I start late fees and send a third overdue notice to the client.

1
  • +1 I don't understand how anyone here can say $400 is "fair."
    – o_O
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 21:48
1

Why can't you charge future clients in upfront installments?

  1. You take a certain percentage upfront
  2. You can milestone if you like or skip to 3 if smaller projects
  3. You load an installation of the project on your own servers for testing and show the client
  4. Client pays remainder
  5. You deliver the code and/or install it on their servers according to your contract

That way, they can't get the goods and skip out on the bill. If they skip the bill, they don't get anything out of it as you shouldn't have even started without getting something upfront.

0

I also don't think you're undercharging. I contract in the UK and charge inbetween £250 & £300 a day. My freelance contracts aren't as lucrative as that but a 'brochure' site (10-20 pages, no backend/database) would be charged at around £800-900.

I have an advantage in as much as I also host the sites that I develop so, if a customer doesn't pay, then I can suspend their site until they do. I've written that clause into my terms and conditions (which appear on every invoice I issue).

I also don't think that 40 day payment terms are out of the ordinary. However, it's worth getting these things straight before starting the contract.

1
  • It's nice UK laws allow you to do that. I recently read an article where an American guy did that same thing and got burned by a court telling him he couldn't interfere with the client's business and the money he cost them greatly overshadowed the money they owed the developer. So in the end he had to pay them, let them have all the code and move to another host even though he stated in his terms he could do that if they were late.
    – o_O
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 21:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.