Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Scott
  • 17.5k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 72

Yes. It's exceptionally unethical in most instances unless it's agreed upon prior to the work being performed.

In all probability the only reason this "program" was createscreated was due to the client paying you to create it. Any client paying you for youonly to then have you turn around and release, the product they paid for, for free is going to be very, very, very upset. Possibly even so much as to consider legal recourse.

In addition, the contract for the work may mean you don't own the IPIntellectual Property (IP) and would be essentially distributing it against the rights you have. No way of knowing this without seeing the contract.

In the end, the one thing you can be absolutely certain of is such an action will spark horrible word-of-mouth for your services from the client who paid you.

(I'm honestly amazed this is even a consideration.)

Yes. It's exceptionally unethical in most instances unless it's agreed upon prior to the work being performed.

In all probability the only reason this "program" was creates was due to the client paying you to create it. Any client paying you for you to then release the product for free is going to be very, very, very upset.

In addition, the contract for the work may mean you don't own the IP and would be essentially distributing it against the rights you have. No way of knowing this without seeing the contract.

In the end, the one thing you can be absolutely certain of is such an action will spark horrible word-of-mouth for your services from the client who paid you.

Yes. It's exceptionally unethical in most instances unless it's agreed upon prior to the work being performed.

In all probability the only reason this "program" was created was due to the client paying you to create it. Any client paying you only to then have you turn around and release, the product they paid for, for free is going to be very, very, very upset. Possibly even so much as to consider legal recourse.

In addition, the contract for the work may mean you don't own the Intellectual Property (IP) and would be essentially distributing it against the rights you have. No way of knowing this without seeing the contract.

In the end, the one thing you can be absolutely certain of is such an action will spark horrible word-of-mouth for your services from the client who paid you.

(I'm honestly amazed this is even a consideration.)

Source Link
Scott
  • 17.5k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 72

Yes. It's exceptionally unethical in most instances unless it's agreed upon prior to the work being performed.

In all probability the only reason this "program" was creates was due to the client paying you to create it. Any client paying you for you to then release the product for free is going to be very, very, very upset.

In addition, the contract for the work may mean you don't own the IP and would be essentially distributing it against the rights you have. No way of knowing this without seeing the contract.

In the end, the one thing you can be absolutely certain of is such an action will spark horrible word-of-mouth for your services from the client who paid you.