Timeline for Bartering - client has cancelled and is asking for money
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:30 | comment | added | Xavier J | US. And studied this in law school before I decided to stay in IT services instead. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:11 | comment | added | daaxix | @codenoire Are you in the EU or US? Your terminology is something I've never encountered in US contract law. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 23:01 | comment | added | daaxix | If you signed a contract with the store stating that they will provide you with the item at a specific price, then yes they would be in breach. It depends on the specific language contained in the emails which were exchanged... | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 22:23 | comment | added | Xavier J | No, no, no. Unless the agreement specified that the arrangement would go on forever, the doctor is not in breach because the commodity being traded is in a unit that is severable (hour). That said, the doctor may decide to not contribute more hours but it does not relieve the OP of his side of the bargain. This is just like when you visit a grocery store after viewing an item in a sale paper - if the store runs out, you can't force the store to provide you the item at the same price later (though it'd be nice). | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 20:20 | comment | added | daaxix | It is in breach if he is saying that he no longer wants to offer his services in exchange for the OP's services, which I'm fairly certain is the case. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 18:52 | comment | added | Xavier J | There's no breach. A breach is a situation where a party fails to perform per an agreement. The doctor has performed, but is also trying to modify the agreement after having performed. It's more a situation of "buyer's remorse" than anything else. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 0:37 | history | answered | daaxix | CC BY-SA 3.0 |