3

I work for a client for a few hours a week as a freelance web developer. I'm a mid level developer, but sometimes I make easy stupid mistakes, like spending around 35mins wondering why the addon I created is not working and start debugging to find out I didn't activate it in the first place. should I charge on easy stupid mistakes like that?

  • Would I charge my clients for time I spent working for them due to my own lack of being thorough and my inattentiveness? No, I wouldn't. – joeqwerty May 28 at 17:06
  • @joeqwerty Most of freelancers advice to not charge per hour but for product and or service. At least in my experience it never works out with me. – jluizsouzadev Sep 28 at 0:35
3

Delays which are due to your business/working practices are typically not the clients responsibility.

Let's look at the situation with a similar scenario.....

You're working along on a client's project and mistakenly close a file without saving it. Silly error, but I'm sure it's happened to most. This error means you have to redo what you just did for the past hour. That's an additional hour of your time.

If something, in the middle of a client's project, incurs time not directly related to the completion of the project, then it should not be invoiced. If I made some silly oversight which adds significant time to working hours in order to correct, I wouldn't feel right invoicing the client for time spent correcting my oversight. I'd not invoice for time spent on my error.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Okay but here's the thing, the client knows that I've never work on the platform he provided before, and sometimes my mistakes are lack of experience with the platform's logic, not coding itself. – Cayenne May 28 at 20:47
  • And that's the nature of our work, much of our time is spent on patching stuff together and debugging issues, it's not always coding – Cayenne May 28 at 20:50
  • 2
    I guess that's your call then as to what's inexperience and learning and what's simply an error. I don't think anyone else can answer that for you. – Scott May 29 at 7:24
5

I couldn't help but had to leave my own insights on this matter as I am seeing two of those previous answers are all implying a client shouldn't be charged for his employee's mistakes.

If this question is about the rights of getting paid when the delays have been made due to freelancer's inexperience, low-level skills, or working practices - as opposed to his/her hidden features like characteristics, inattentiveness, or negligence - the client still has to pay for it. Errors and mistakes happen everywhere, every time. There's nothing guilty about it.

The reason is clear: The client shouldn't have hired his employee in the first place if his/her skills didn't meet up his expectations. That's what employers do. And most importantly, he should be responsible for his choice of choosing whom he is working with, and what his employee's mindset looks like.

Refusing to pay for the mistakes can only happen when the client thinks he has hired a working robot, not a human. Otherwise, any hours spent on the work that is (even slightly) related to the client's project are subject to the regular payment, especially when you are working on an hourly basis.

As long as you have materials that support your claim you didn't idly spend time for those 35 mins, you have full rights to get paid.

| improve this answer | |
  • Employees are quite different than freelancers. – Scott Jun 18 at 5:37
  • 1
    You got a point but the very topic we are currently involved in is about the basic work ethics - which shouldn't be differentiated by contract types. – filipvk Jun 19 at 2:49
0

We would not charge our client on stupid mistakes. We commonly subtract the estimated time from the final hours if hourly pay was required for their project. Of course, any developer will probably spend time figuring out things and testing things trying to get it to work properly. In this case we might take a few minutes off that make sense. It's all about reason.

If you were hiring someone to do something, and you found out they charged you $100 extra because they did not do what they should've known to do (press the apply button before running the new code) how would you feel? Would you happily pay them or feel this would have been all avoided if they simply pressed the apply button instead of trying to edit, and reedit the code for 30 minutes to an hour over the course of the project?.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.