A client has given me a contract that needs some changes before I'd sign it. I have no problem reading and doing basic research for a few pages of legalese. Most of the contract is fine but there are specific parts which I want to change.

Two paths occur to me:

  1. Get a lawyer involved on my behalf
  2. Express my concerns in plain language and have my clients lawyer incorporate the changes

Am I being naive assuming that option 2 is even a possibility?


I got some legal advice, and it was a great help.

In five years of freelancing I've read probably a dozen different basic 1-2 page contracts that had very plain language and I had no problem understanding their intent, and felt comfortable with the terms.

Then I received a contract that was longer, more technical, and after a couple of hours of research I knew that some of it was over my head. After finding a local law firm that I liked, I was able to parse through all of the confusion and I got to say, getting a lawyers help was a great idea. I found out that my reading of certain parts was maybe about %50 correct: I both completely misinterpreted the severity of certain statements and completely missed some problematic things.

So, if you have a dense contract that is confusing it's probably a good idea to get some legal advice.

1 Answer 1


Well, since my wife is a lawyer I've asked her such questions zillions of times :).

To change the contract, you can use the everyday language and, as you said, their lawyers will change the contract. But are you sure that you understand the contract 100%? Many, many times I've given a "simple contract" to my wife, and she found tens of hidden clauses which I did not understand even after she explained them to me. The only thing I understood was that I should not sign the contract as given.

It's like you're making an application for a client and he asks for source code. Do you really think he can understand the code and find flaws in it? Or when he's testing a demo - a small slowdown in the app which he may not notice at all was due to a lazy implementation in your source :).

To get back to your question. When I have to sign contracts, I do like this:

IF he can sue me and if I can face legal consequences (not all foreign clients can sue me), then I give this to my wife and I do not start working before all has been cleared up.

IF he cannot sue me, then I usually sign after a quick look on it. Like when you sign NDAs or similar contracts. In such cases, I do not need a legal protection.

Find your option and do not sorry for money you spend on a legal counsellor. Consequences may costs you 10 times more.

  • That is a good distinction: risk of being sued. Also, I am aware that it's not simply the words but the associated legal precedents which effect the import of certain bits of legalese… I probably shouldn't trust my online researching but there is a surprising amount of good info out there.
    – Mark Fox
    Sep 2, 2013 at 18:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.