A company asked me to send them a quote for a project, and very specifically asked for a fixed or flat fee. I specified the deliverables, broken down by category and provided a project cost, which they signed. 8 days into the contract, they decided that they wanted to cancel and asked that I send them an invoice for work completed. I did about 10-15 more hours of work on deliverables other than the ones that I sent them. Some of this was research to figure out how to support their (very) frugal spending limits. I feel that since they cancelled the flat fee contract, they should pay me for my research work. There was no cancellation language in the signed contract.

  • 1
    So what's the problem in sending them invoice for the number of hours you put into the project? This happened to me as well and I was paid for the time I spent on the project, not the full amount. – Peter MV May 12 '16 at 8:47
  • " how to support their (very) frugal spending limits". And: "I did about 10-15 more hours of work" -are you talking about 2 working days lost and that's why you cry...seriously? – matheszabi May 13 '16 at 3:27
  • 1
    @matheszabi 2 days of work on 8 days of work is 25% of the total hours work. On top of that they might have rejected/renegotiated other clients to free up space. On top of that, principle. – PixelSnader May 13 '16 at 12:10

Wrong approach! The fixed-price contract was signed. You started work, in reliance. Maybe they don't need your work any more, or had buyer's remorse -- but you are owed the FULL price. Don't accept anything less.

If you were hourly, then it would make sense to break it down into hours (units) of work. Your customer is trying to get over on you. Unless you put milestones into the contract, it's not severable (divisible).

  • In principle, this is correct. However - if the value of the contract is low (which seems to be the case) no one wants to go to court - and court is actually the only way to enforce a contract. – morsor May 13 '16 at 7:33

Send an invoice based on an hourly rate you find reasonable.

If they balk at the figure, both parties will have to negotiate a settlement.

Perhaps any future contracts should make provisions for similar situations. Personally, I prefer keeping smaller contracts simple and negotiate changes if needed, rather than attempting to cover all possible situations in a long 'legalese' contract.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.